A species interval backed by two of nine accessions raises the obvious question: are the other seven contradicting it, or just under-tested? The workflow answers with three ways an accession could plausibly join the supporting set:
Simple margin — its own longest ≥threshold year is within 5 years below the species interval. It's close; one more monitoring round might confirm it. Model point — a per-storage curve fit predicts its germination at the species interval would still meet its threshold. Model CI — even the lower confidence bound of that prediction clears it (the strongest of the three).
Report the union plus the disjoint breakdown (simple-only, model-only, CI-only, overlap), and — the part most pipelines skip — an audit file listing exactly which accession IDs fall in which bucket per species. Counts summarize; IDs let a curator walk to the freezer. Sanity-check the arithmetic: supporting + potential can never exceed total accessions.